Strengthening Math and Science Literacy in the Philippines: Confronting Classroom Challenges with Innovation and Resilience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66206/9h4x5995Keywords:
STEM education; Southeast Asia; ASEAN; Philippines; comparative education; international benchmarking; PISA; TIMSS; mathematics literacy; science literacy; learning outcomes; educational equity; teacher professional development; curriculum alignment; assessment literacy; instructional quality; school resources; system-level reform; policy analysis; UNESCO Education 2030; World Bank SABER; SDG 4 (Quality Education); human capital; large-scale assessments (ILSA); evidence-informed policymaking; desk-based comparative review; inclusion/exclusion criteria; analytical framework; validation and triangulation.Abstract
Mathematics and science literacy are vital drivers of national development, fostering innovation, competitiveness, and inclusive growth. Yet international assessments consistently show that Filipino students lag far behind peers: PISA 2022 ranked the Philippines at the bottom among participating countries (mean scores: Math 355, Science 356), and PISA 2018 found that only ~22% met baseline science proficiency. This study synthesizes evidence on STEM education in the Philippines and Southeast Asia to identify barriers and promising strategies. Using a conceptual framework grounded in prior research (e.g., factors like teacher quality, resources, and student attitudes), we conducted a desk-based comparative analysis of education policies, reports, and empirical studies. The analysis systematically compared international assessment results, policy documents, and peer-reviewed studies using explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure comparability across the country. Results highlight common challenges: chronic underfunding (per-student spending ~90% below OECD average), shortages of qualified teachers (whose low salaries predict poor student outcomes), inadequate infrastructure (lacking labs, internet, and climate-resilient classrooms), and equity gaps (over 90% of children fail to reach minimum proficiency). Neighboring countries offer counterpoints: for example, Malaysia’s nationwide STEAM curriculum, Thailand’s intensive STEM teacher training and industry partnerships, and Vietnam’s international teaching pilots. The discussion considers how such strategies could be adapted to the Philippine context: increasing education budgets, modernizing the curriculum through project-based and inquiry-based learning, significantly expanding teacher professional development and compensation, upgrading classroom facilities (with climate and digital resilience), and strengthening partnerships with industry and NGOs. The discussion examined the policy relevance and contextual feasibility of identified regional strategies for the Philippine education system. These recommendations are grounded in UNESCO and the World Bank's priorities for equitable, high-quality STEM education. In conclusion, a coordinated national strategy that addresses these systemic issues could substantially boost math and science literacy in the Philippines, yielding long-term gains in innovation capacity and socioeconomic development.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asian Research Journal of Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



